<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carolina Review Daily &#187; Gay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crdaily.com/tag/gay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crdaily.com</link>
	<description>The blog of the monthly conservative journal of UNC-Chapel Hill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UNC Discriminates Against Gays</title>
		<link>http://crdaily.com/2009/08/unc-discriminates-against-gays/</link>
		<comments>http://crdaily.com/2009/08/unc-discriminates-against-gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jlcrowde</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBGTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crdaily.com/?p=2599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the peer-reviewed health journal, Tobacco Control, gays are more likely to smoke.  This report comprises the first “systematic review among sexual minority populations” and concludes that to be gay requires a “higher risk of smoking.” This proves just one thing: it is not a choice to smoke.  Obviously, then, the right to smoke [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the peer-reviewed health journal, Tobacco Control, gays are more likely to smoke.  This report comprises the first “systematic review among sexual minority populations” and concludes that to be gay requires a “higher risk of smoking.”</p>
<p>This proves just one thing: it is not a choice to smoke.  Obviously, then, the right to smoke is protected by the non-discrimination policy that clearly states that the university may not discriminate based on “sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.” </p>
<p>Frankly it is quite clear, science has made it so, that smoking is an essential piece to the delicate quilt that makes up this, UNC’s most cherished socio-demographic group.   Smoking is a form of “gender expression.”</p>
<p>And yet, last year UNC put a non-smoking policy into place that does not allow one to stand within one-hundred feet of any building.  This forces the inhalers to congregate by the flagpole in the lower quad prompting only the most savvy, yuppie UNC students to term it the &#8220;gaypole&#8221; just as these same students did with the &#8220;gayble&#8221; outside of Lenoir last year (as reported on the prestigeous DTH&#8217;s front page).</p>
<p>The smoking policy is put in place in order to, according to the university, maintain a &#8220;healthy work and learning environment.&#8221;  Does UNC seriously contend that gays are a threat to a healthy work and learning environment?</p>
<p>If caught outside the circumference of the circle drawn for them by the state, they could face up to $25 in fines and will have to incur $121 in court fees.  The homosexuals who are forced to wear this proverbial Star of David are not even afforded a trashcan and yet face further discrimination when they litter.</p>
<p>This is wrong.  And everyone knows that Hell has no fury like that of the LGBTQ community.  They could reverse this draconian policy in one week if they wanted to.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://crdaily.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crdaily.com/2009/08/unc-discriminates-against-gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He&#039;s at it Again</title>
		<link>http://crdaily.com/2009/03/hes-at-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://crdaily.com/2009/03/hes-at-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Dent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crdaily.com/2009/03/hes-at-it-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bawney Fwank, when not threatening the lives of AIG executives or dabbling in unconstitutional post facto confiscatory laws, apparently takes time to add to the debate over gay marriage: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/23/rep-frank-calls-justice-scalia-homophobe/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bawney Fwank, when not threatening the lives of AIG executives or dabbling in unconstitutional post facto confiscatory laws, apparently takes time to add to the debate over gay marriage: <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/23/rep-frank-calls-justice-scalia-homophobe/">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/23/rep-frank-calls-justice-scalia-homophobe/</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://crdaily.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crdaily.com/2009/03/hes-at-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
